Introduction:
The best project management tool in the world means nothing if your team can’t communicate effectively within it. Asana includes powerful collaboration features that reduce the need for status meetings, long email chains, and scattered conversations across multiple apps. From commenting directly on tasks to using status updates that keep stakeholders informed, these features help distributed teams stay connected without constant interruptions. The key is knowing which collaboration tools to use in which situations so your team communicates clearly without creating notification overload. These practices work hand in hand with the project management fundamentals covered in our full guide on how to use asana for project management to create a workflow where information flows naturally.
Using Comments to Keep Conversations Contextual
Comments are the foundation of collaboration in Asana because they keep discussions attached to the relevant work. When you comment on a task, that conversation becomes part of the task’s history. Anyone who needs context can read through the thread and understand what decisions were made, what obstacles came up, and how the work evolved.
The alternative is conversations scattered across email, Slack, text messages, and hallway discussions. This fragmentation means people miss important information and you waste time catching people up or searching for where a decision was documented. Comments solve this by centralizing communication where the work lives.
Use comments for questions about the task, status updates, feedback on work in progress, decisions that need to be made, or obstacles that have come up. Each comment notifies the task assignee and anyone following the task, so the right people see the information without you having to track down email addresses or remember who needs to be included.
Comments support rich formatting including bold text, bullet points, links, and code blocks. Use formatting to make longer comments more scannable. A comment that’s just a wall of text is less likely to be read carefully than one with clear structure.
You can attach files directly to comments, which is perfect for sharing drafts, screenshots, or supporting documents related to the discussion. The file becomes part of the task record rather than buried in an email attachment somewhere.
The key is keeping comments focused on the specific task at hand. If a comment thread starts branching into broader project decisions or topics affecting multiple tasks, consider moving that discussion to a project-level conversation or creating a separate task to track the decision.
Mastering the @Mention for Focused Attention
The @mention feature lets you pull specific people into a conversation even if they’re not assigned to the task or following it. Type @ followed by someone’s name and they’ll receive a notification about your comment. This is how you expand the circle of people involved in a discussion without adding everyone as a task follower.
Use @mentions when you need input from someone who isn’t directly responsible for the task but has relevant expertise. A developer working on a feature might @mention a designer to get feedback on the interface. A marketer might @mention the sales lead to verify messaging before launching a campaign.
You can also @mention entire teams by typing @ and the team name. This notifies everyone on that team about your comment. Use this sparingly because it creates notifications for many people, but it’s valuable when something genuinely affects an entire team and everyone should be aware.
@Mentions work in task descriptions and project descriptions too, not just comments. This lets you draw attention to important information or assign research tasks within descriptions. A project description might say “Need competitive analysis from @Sarah before kickoff” to make that request explicit and create a notification.
The etiquette around @mentions matters. Don’t @mention people unnecessarily or for things they don’t actually need to see. Overusing @mentions trains people to ignore them, which defeats the purpose. Treat each @mention as you would tapping someone on the shoulder to ask them something. If you wouldn’t interrupt them for it, don’t @mention them.
Following Tasks and Projects for Visibility
Following a task or project means you receive notifications about activity without being the assignee or a direct participant. This creates lightweight visibility into work that’s relevant to you but not your direct responsibility.
Click the Follow button on any task and you’ll get notified when comments are added, the status changes, or other significant updates occur. This is perfect for managers who want visibility into key tasks without being assigned to them, or for team members who have a stake in work even though they’re not doing it themselves.
Project following works the same way at the project level. Follow a project and you’ll see updates about new tasks, status changes, and conversations. This helps people stay informed about initiatives adjacent to their work without actively participating in every detail.
The balance with following is staying informed without drowning in notifications. Be selective about what you follow. Just because something is interesting doesn’t mean you need real-time updates about it. Follow work where being out of the loop would actually cause problems or where you genuinely need to provide input.
You can unfollow tasks and projects anytime, and you should when they’re no longer relevant to you. Old follows accumulate over time and create notification noise that makes it harder to spot what actually matters.
Some teams establish following conventions as part of their workflow. All tasks in a certain project might automatically add the project manager as a follower. Tasks tagged with specific labels might trigger certain stakeholders to follow them. These patterns create predictable visibility without requiring manual work.
Providing Effective Status Updates
Status updates are project-level announcements that communicate progress, blockers, and key information to everyone who needs to know. They’re more visible than task comments because they appear in project views and get sent to project members and followers.
Post a status update when something significant happens in the project: a major milestone is reached, a deadline changes, you encounter a blocker that affects the timeline, or you need to broadcast a decision to everyone involved. Status updates are for information that affects multiple people or the project as a whole.
Good status updates are concise but informative. State what’s changed, why it matters, and what action if any is needed from recipients. “We’ve completed the design phase ahead of schedule and are moving into development. Developers should review the designs by EOD Thursday” tells people exactly what they need to know.
Use the status indicator that comes with updates: on track, at risk, or off track. This quick visual signal helps people prioritize which updates they need to read immediately. A project that’s suddenly off track demands more attention than one that remains on track.
Status updates support @mentions too, so you can call out specific people or teams within the update if their attention is particularly important. “Development is blocked waiting for @Engineering-Team to provision the staging environment” makes it clear who needs to act.
The frequency of status updates depends on the project. High-stakes projects might warrant weekly updates. Routine projects might only need updates when status changes or at major milestones. Too many updates and people tune them out, too few and people feel out of the loop.
Running Effective Meetings Through Asana
Asana isn’t just for asynchronous work. Many teams use it to structure and document synchronous meetings too. A meeting agenda project or recurring meeting task keeps everyone aligned on what needs to be discussed and captures decisions made during the meeting.
Create a recurring task or project for regular meetings like weekly team syncs, monthly reviews, or one-on-ones. The description becomes the agenda where people can add topics in advance. During the meeting, add comments to capture key decisions, action items, and follow-up needed.
For each action item that comes out of a meeting, create a task right there in Asana with clear ownership and due dates. This prevents the common problem of meetings generating lists of to-dos that never get tracked properly. The action items are in the system immediately where they can be managed alongside other work.
Meeting notes in task comments create a searchable record that people can reference later. How many times have you been in a meeting where someone asks “What did we decide about that last month?” and nobody remembers? With meeting tasks in Asana, you search for the meeting date and review the comment thread.
Some teams use board view projects for meeting agendas with columns like “To Discuss,” “In Progress,” and “Complete.” Topics move through the columns during the meeting, providing a visual structure that keeps things moving.
Coordinating Handoffs Between Team Members
Work often moves from person to person as it progresses through stages. A design goes to development, development goes to QA, QA goes to deployment. Clean handoffs prevent work from stalling between stages.
The simplest handoff mechanism is reassigning the task when responsibility shifts. The designer completes their work and reassigns the task to the developer with a comment explaining what’s ready and any context needed. The reassignment creates a notification and makes it clear who’s responsible now.
For more complex handoffs with review steps, use subtasks. The parent task might be “Ship new homepage” and subtasks handle design, development, QA, and deployment. Each subtask has its own assignee, and completing one subtask signals the next person to begin their piece.
Task dependencies make handoffs explicit in timeline view. When Task A blocks Task B, completing Task A triggers a notification to the person responsible for Task B. This automation reduces the coordination overhead of remembering to tap people on the shoulder when you’ve finished your part.
Comments during handoffs should be detailed enough to prevent back-and-forth questions. Don’t just reassign a task with no explanation. Include a comment that says what’s been completed, what still needs attention, any issues encountered, and where to find relevant files or information.
Some teams create custom fields for handoff status: “Ready for Development,” “In QA,” “Pending Approval.” This makes the current stage visible at a glance and helps people filter their views to see work that’s ready for them.
Managing Feedback and Approvals
Feedback loops can be smooth or painful depending on how you handle them in Asana. The key is making it clear what needs feedback, who should provide it, and what happens after feedback is incorporated.
When a task needs review or approval, reassign it to the reviewer with a comment explaining what kind of feedback you’re looking for. “Please review the copy and check that the product details are accurate” is more helpful than just “please review.”
Reviewers should provide feedback in task comments with enough specificity that the person doing the work knows exactly what to change. “The intro paragraph doesn’t work” is less helpful than “The intro paragraph buries the key benefit. Can you lead with the time-saving angle instead?”
For approval workflows with multiple reviewers, use subtasks for each person’s review. The parent task is “Get landing page approved” and subtasks are “Design review – Sarah,” “Copy review – Mike,” “Legal review – Alex.” This creates clear ownership and lets you track which reviews are complete.
Some teams use custom fields to track approval status: “Needs Review,” “Changes Requested,” “Approved.” Combined with board view, this creates a visual approval pipeline where you can see everything waiting for review, everything that needs revisions, and everything that’s cleared to move forward.
Set clear expectations about feedback turnaround time. If you assign a review task with a due date two days out, you’re communicating that this is time-sensitive. If there’s no due date, people may not realize the urgency.
Creating Transparency Without Micromanagement
One of Asana’s biggest benefits is visibility into work without constant check-ins. Managers can see what their team is working on, team members can see what their colleagues are handling, and everyone has context about how pieces fit together. This transparency reduces status meetings and interruptions.
The key is creating visibility through natural work documentation rather than requiring extra reporting. When people keep their tasks updated, add comments about progress and blockers, and mark tasks complete when finished, transparency happens automatically as a byproduct of doing the work.
Managers should resist the temptation to comment on every task just to show they’re paying attention. This creates notification noise and makes people feel micromanaged. Instead, look for patterns in task completion, identify where people seem stuck, and offer help on those specific items.
Team members should update task status and post comments when there’s meaningful information to share, not just to create the appearance of activity. A comment that says “Working on this” doesn’t add value. A comment that says “Design is complete, moving to development but need to wait for API access” gives useful context.
Use My Tasks effectively to give people autonomy over their workload while maintaining visibility for managers. Everyone can see what they’re responsible for and prioritize accordingly, while managers can check in on individual workloads without asking for status reports.
Reducing Notification Overload
Asana’s collaboration features are only valuable if people actually pay attention to notifications. Too many notifications and people start ignoring them or turning them off entirely. The solution is being thoughtful about what generates notifications and helping your team configure settings appropriately.
Not every activity needs to notify everyone. Completing a task might not need to ping all followers unless it’s a particularly significant task. Adding a comment that doesn’t require action might not need to notify everyone, just the task assignee.
Encourage your team to customize notification settings to match their work style. Some people want email notifications for everything. Others prefer to check Asana at scheduled times and want minimal email. Asana supports both approaches.
Use batched digests for lower-priority notifications instead of real-time alerts. Instead of getting an email every time something happens in a project you’re following, get one digest at the end of the day summarizing activity. This keeps you informed without constant interruptions.
Be selective about who you @mention and when. Each @mention creates a notification for that person. If you’re @mentioning five people in every comment, you’re creating a lot of noise. Mention only people who genuinely need to see this specific information.
Collaboration in Asana works best when it replaces other communication channels rather than adding to them. If you’re still having the same status meetings, sending the same email updates, and using Asana on top of that, you’ve just added work rather than streamlining it. The goal is to shift conversations into Asana so you can reduce meetings, emails, and scattered communication that fragments your team’s attention. With solid collaboration habits in place, the next step is connecting Asana to your other tools to create a truly seamless workflow, which is exactly what our guide on asana integrations covers.
About the Author
